MindsHub Air model
A general-purpose model for everyday work with agents.
Use in MindsHub Agents or through MindsHub Inference.
mindshub_air Use Air with the API → Model rankings
Compare the live MindsHub catalog by capability, response time, and measured cost per task. For newer releases beyond this catalog, read the model comparison.
Use the included models at no charge with your MindsHub account.
Included models
A general-purpose model for everyday work with agents.
Use in MindsHub Agents or through MindsHub Inference.
mindshub_air Use Air with the API → TypeSafe’s decision model for classification, routing and scoring.
Get choices, scores and probabilities through the Decisions API.
jev Jev API guide → Choose a model for the kind of work you run.
Many steps, many files, and the model has to keep its own plan straight for an hour. A one-shot index only half predicts that, so run your own repo through the top two.
Research, analysis and anything where being wrong is expensive.
For chat and other interactive work, test a lower reasoning setting and measure the wait on your own requests.
One request carrying a whole corpus of mixed media, reasoned over as a unit.
Classification, extraction, tagging — millions of calls where the bill is the constraint.
Data that cannot leave your environment, or volume that beats renting.
Sort and filter the table, then expand a row for context, modalities, reasoning settings, and billing notes.
| 58 Frontier | 66.9% | 93 tok/sec | 692.6s first answer | $5.98 | $4 / $20 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Difficult reasoning, code changes and document work
| ||||||||
| 56 Frontier | 61.0% | 138 tok/sec | 438.4s first answer | $5.46 | $2 / $10 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Reasoning and coding with effort tuned to the task
| ||||||||
| 53 Frontier | 56.5% | 48 tok/sec | 410.6s first answer | $3.26 | $10 / $50 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| Hard end-to-end work across code, browsers, and professional files
| ||||||||
| 53 Frontier | 63.1% | 69 tok/sec | 286.0s first answer | $7.63 | $10 / $50 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Difficult reasoning and coding, with a safeguard fallback
| ||||||||
| 52 Frontier | 54.2% | 58 tok/sec | 314.5s first answer | $0.72 | $2 / $10 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| Coding and multi-step agent work at GPT-6 Sol's list rates
| ||||||||
| 51 Frontier | 56.4% | 52 tok/sec | 54.3s first answer | $5.86 | $5 / $25 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Reasoning, coding and review for existing Opus 5 workflows
| ||||||||
| 50 Frontier | 61.0% | 63 tok/sec | 107.0s first answer | $8.75 | $10 / $50 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| The previous Fable, for traffic already validated against it
| ||||||||
| 48 Frontier | 57.6% | 85 tok/sec | 132.5s first answer | $1.04 | $2 / $10 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| The previous Sol, for agent and coding work already validated on it
| ||||||||
| 48 Frontier | 58.8% | 97 tok/sec | 70.5s first answer | $1.60 | $1.25 / $4.25 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Long-context agentic coding that reads text, images and video
| ||||||||
| 47 Frontier | 57.1% | 74 tok/sec | 98.0s first answer | $1.99 | $5 / $30 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| General reasoning and coding work with OpenAI's tooling around it
| ||||||||
| 46 Frontier | 57.4% | 65 tok/sec | 70.5s first answer | $3.74 | $2 / $6 our rate | 500K | Closed | |
| Long coding and knowledge-work runs with web and X tools
| ||||||||
| 45 Frontier | 59.0% | 62 tok/sec | 26.8s first answer | $2.01 | $1.40 / $4.40 our rate | 1M | Open GLM-5.3 License | |
| Frontier-class coding and security review at a low rate
| ||||||||
| 44 Near-frontier | 53.0% | 62 tok/sec | 45.1s first answer | $1.75 | $2 / $6 our rate | 500K | Closed | |
| Reasoning with access to the live web
| ||||||||
| 44 Near-frontier | 59.5% | 41 tok/sec | 52.0s first answer | $2.00 | $3 / $15 our rate | 1M | Open Kimi K3 License | |
| Long autonomous coding runs you can self-host
| ||||||||
| 42 Near-frontier | 51.6% | 51 tok/sec | 41.0s first answer | $0.25 | $0.15 / $0.50 our rate | 1M | Open MIT | |
| A high score per dollar, on MIT-licensed weights
| ||||||||
| 42 Near-frontier | 55.0% | 98 tok/sec | 111.2s first answer | $1.40 | $2 / $12 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| Balanced mid-tier for everyday work
| ||||||||
| 41 Strong | 56.6% | 122 tok/sec | 27.2s first answer | $1.24 | $0.75 / $3.75 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Multimodal agents and long coding work
| ||||||||
| 40 Strong | 57.4% | 402 tok/sec | 15.5s first answer | $0.97 | $1.25 / $4.25 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Cheap closed model that powers the free Meta AI
| ||||||||
| 40 Strong | 54.1% | 39 tok/sec | 54.2s first answer | $2.16 | $2 / $6 our rate | 262K | Open Qwen3.8-Max License | |
| The open-weights Qwen checkpoint, for teams that host their own models
| ||||||||
| 39 Strong | 51.9% | 212 tok/sec | 10.4s first answer | $0.27 | $0.30 / $1.20 our rate | 1M | Open MIT | |
| Low-cost text and image work on MIT-licensed weights
| ||||||||
| 39 Strong | 55.0% | 49 tok/sec | 16.9s first answer | $0.88 | $2 / $6 our rate | 500K | Closed | |
| Earlier Grok for existing integrations and cost comparisons
| ||||||||
| 39 Strong | 57.2% | 290 tok/sec | 11.9s first answer | $0.93 | $0.75 / $3.75 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Fast multimodal work at a promotional price
| ||||||||
| 38 Solid | 54.6% | 135 tok/sec | 105.3s first answer | $0.07 | $0.10 / $0.50 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| Free general-purpose model access, within fair use
| ||||||||
| 38 Solid | 54.6% | 135 tok/sec | 105.3s first answer | $0.07 | $0.10 / $0.50 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| Focused text and image tasks at low token rates
| ||||||||
| 38 Solid | 54.3% | 75 tok/sec | 202.7s first answer | $5.09 | $2 / $10 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| The previous Sonnet, for routine work already validated on it
| ||||||||
| 38 Solid | — | 84 tok/sec | 69.3s first answer | — | $1.75 / $14 our rate | 400K | Closed | |
| Coding specialist for repo-scale changes
| ||||||||
| 37 Solid | 53.6% | 119 tok/sec | 106.3s first answer | $0.18 | $0.20 / $1.20 our rate | 1.05M | Closed | |
| The previous Luna, for high-volume work already validated on it
| ||||||||
| 34 Solid | 46.6% | ≈1850 tok/sec | — | $1.01 | $0.99 / $1.49 our rate | 131K | API only | |
| A MindsHub model alias optimized for speed, served by Cerebras
| ||||||||
| 34 Solid | 58.8% | — | — | $1.38 | $1.25 / $4.25 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Every input type, at an open-model rate
| ||||||||
| 34 Solid | 53.4% | 184 tok/sec | 14.3s first answer | $1.60 | $0.75 / $3.75 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Fast, high-volume everyday tasks
| ||||||||
| 33 Light | 53.9% | 195 tok/sec | 17.4s first answer | $3.69 | $1.50 / $9 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| The legacy Google Flash, for workloads already built on it
| ||||||||
| 30 Light | 58.7% | 113 tok/sec | 25.9s first answer | $1.30 | $2 / $12 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Huge documents, images, audio and video
| ||||||||
| 26 Light | — | 192 tok/sec | 6.8s first answer | — | $0.50 / $3 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Preview-era Flash, kept so early integrations keep running
| ||||||||
| 24 Light | 52.1% | 271 tok/sec | 101.8s first answer | $0.45 | $0.75 / $4.50 our rate | 400K | Closed | |
| Small and cheap for routine automation
| ||||||||
| 21 Basic | 47.2% | 164 tok/sec | 74.8s first answer | $0.18 | $0.20 / $1.25 our rate | 400K | Closed | |
| Built for throughput on bulk, simple work
| ||||||||
| 17 Basic | 42.2% | 97 tok/sec | 15.2s first answer | $0.28 | $1 / $5 our rate | 200K | Closed | |
| The smallest Claude, for high-volume simple work
| ||||||||
| 16 Basic | 43.4% | 265 tok/sec | 5.8s first answer | $0.06 | $0.25 / $1.50 our rate | 1M | Closed | |
| Lite-tier extraction and classification at scale
| ||||||||
| 12 Basic | 34.0% | 185 tok/sec | 12.8s first answer | $0.11 | $0.15 / $0.60 our rate | 131K | Open Apache 2.0 | |
| Open weights for focused text tasks
| ||||||||
A rotating alias such as gpt always resolves to the most
recent version of that line we serve, so it can move without a code
change on your side. Versioned model lines also have a fixed alias
that names one exact version. The branded MindsHub Air and MindsHub Blaze
aliases have no fixed counterpart.
| Rotating alias | Currently serves | Fixed alias | Older versions still served |
|---|---|---|---|
mindshub_air | Whichever model balances cost, speed and intelligence best — see its board row. | — | — |
mindshub_blaze | A model optimized for speed — see its board row. | — | — |
sonnet | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | sonnet-5-5 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
opus | Claude Opus 5.5 | opus-5-5 | Claude Opus 5 |
fable | Claude Fable 5.1 | fable-5-1 | Claude Fable 5 |
haiku | Claude Haiku 4.5 | haiku-4-5 | — |
gpt | GPT-6 Astra | gpt-6-astra | GPT 5.6 Sol |
gpt-sol | GPT-6.1 Sol | gpt-sol-6-1 | GPT-6 Sol |
gpt-terra | GPT 5.6 Terra | gpt-terra-5-6 | — |
gpt-luna | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-luna-6 | GPT 5.6 Luna |
gpt-codex | GPT 5.3 Codex | gpt-codex-5-3 | — |
gpt-mini | GPT 5.4 Mini | gpt-mini-5-4 | — |
gpt-nano | GPT 5.4 Nano | gpt-nano-5-4 | — |
gemini | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | gemini-3-1-pro | — |
gemini-flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash | gemini-flash-3-8 | Gemini 3.7 Flash , Gemini 3.6 Flash , Gemini 3.5 Flash , Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
gemini-flash-lite | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | gemini-flash-lite-3-1 | — |
kimi | Kimi K3 | kimi-k3 | — |
deepseek-v4-flash | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | deepseek-v4-1-flash | — |
qwen | Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | qwen-3-8-a95b | — |
glm | GLM 5.3 | glm-5-3 | — |
glm-5-3-flash | GLM 5.3 Flash | glm-flash-5-3 | — |
muse-spark | Muse Spark 1.3 | muse-spark-1-3 | Muse Spark 1.2 , Muse Spark 1.1 |
grok | Grok 4.7 | grok-4-7 | Grok 4.6 , Grok 4.5 |
Treat scores within 3 points of each other as ties. For models in that range, speed and cost can help you choose.
A benchmark averages many tasks and can hide weaknesses that matter to you. Use the scores to shortlist two or three models, then test them on your own work. The method below shows how.
Each score is for a model at a specific reasoning setting, usually the top one. Compare it with a lower setting on your own tasks: extra reasoning can change quality, cost and wait. These figures do not predict the bill or success rate of an individual request.
What each model family offers Read the benchmark behind the score Choose for your workload Point a coding agent at any of them
Bars run from zero and are relative to the leader — a truncated axis would manufacture a gap that isn't there. Scores within 3 points of each other are a tie.
Latency is the wait for the first answer token, including thinking time. Throughput is how quickly the rest arrives. The chart shows both because a model can be strong on one and weak on the other.
Wait for the first answer token Streaming the answer
The estimate for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is about 10 seconds and Claude Opus 5.5 is about 703. Both use the same answer length, but different model configurations. Top-effort reasoning can account for much of that wait.
On a 200-token reply the wait is 81% to 100% of the wall clock, so latency is worth weighting. A longer answer gives streaming speed more weight, but a large reasoning budget can still dominate the wait. The control above the chart switches between the two views.
Region, prompt length, cache hit rate and reasoning effort all move these figures. Use them to rank candidates, then measure the two you shortlist against your own traffic.
Token prices do not show how many tokens a model will use to finish the job. Reasoning models can vary widely on that second number.
You pay for reasoning tokens as well as the visible answer. A model with a lower token rate can still cost more per completed task.
It is somebody else's task, at each model's top effort, priced at the provider's own rate — so treat it as a way to rank candidates, not a forecast of your bill.
Why cheap models often aren't Two levers that cut the bill The full rate card
Both figures come from the same rate card — each provider's own published price, which is what these tasks were costed at, and not always the rate in the Price column above. GPT 5.6 Sol's output rate is a promotional rate OpenAI lists through at least November 21, 2026. And the lesson is not that cheap models are a lie: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite beats its own rate card — 13.3× cheaper on paper, 33.2× cheaper per task. It is that you cannot rank them by reading price pages.
Use the board for a shortlist, then test it against real examples.
Use the task router above, or filter the board to your constraint — open weights, a modality, a latency ceiling. Stop at three.
With the messy context attached. Not clean samples: the actual ones you ran last week, including the awkward ones.
Not maximum. The reasoning dial moves cost further than switching models does, and every published cost-per-task figure is measured at the top setting.
Every provider returns a usage object. Multiply input,
cached input and output separately — those three rates can differ by
an order of magnitude.
If eight of ten came back usable, your real cost is the total divided by eight. That division is the one no leaderboard can do for you.
One API key reaches every model here, so a bake-off is a string change rather than three integrations. There's a runnable version, a cost measurement guide, a guide to running evals, and a free working session if you'd rather do it with an engineer.
Choose which categories of cookies and similar technologies you allow us to use on this site. You can change these choices at any time via the Cookie preferences link in the footer.
Required for the site to work — the anonymous session cookie that lets us measure aggregate traffic. Always on.
Anonymous usage measurement (PostHog server-side). Helps us understand which pages are useful.
Click-ID attribution to ad platforms (Google, X, LinkedIn) and identified events so we can measure ad performance.
California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, and other US state privacy laws give you the right to opt out of the “sale” or “sharing” of your personal information for cross-context behavioral advertising. We don’t sell your information for money, but we do share identifiers with our advertising partners to measure ad performance. You can opt out here.
See our Privacy Notice and Cookie Policy for full detail.